Saturday, 21 February 2026

CH 11: HOW CHILDREN LEARN: PROCESSES AND STRATEGIES

0 comments

 

📚 PART III: LEARNING AND PEDAGOGY

CHAPTER 11: HOW CHILDREN LEARN: PROCESSES AND STRATEGIES


📖 CHAPTER OVERVIEW

SectionTopicPSTET WeightagePage No.
11.1How Children Think and Learn: Learning Styles and Information ProcessingHigh1
11.2Children's Strategies of Learning: Observation, Imitation, Exploration, QuestioningVery High10
11.3Why Children 'Fail' to Achieve Success in School PerformanceVery High18
11.4Child as a Problem Solver and 'Scientific Investigator': Inquiry-Based LearningHigh28

🎯 LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completing this chapter, you will be able to:

  • ✅ Explain different learning styles and how children process information

  • ✅ Describe the natural learning strategies children use—observation, imitation, exploration, and questioning

  • ✅ Analyze the multiple factors contributing to school underachievement beyond the individual child

  • ✅ Apply inquiry-based learning approaches that position children as problem-solvers and scientific investigators

  • ✅ Create classroom environments that nurture curiosity and scientific temper

  • ✅ Answer PSTET questions on learning processes and pedagogy with confidence


🔑 KEY TERMS TO REMEMBER

TermQuick Definition
Learning StyleIndividual differences in how people perceive, interact with, and respond to the learning environment 
Cognitive StyleIntrinsic information-processing patterns representing a person's typical mode of perceiving, thinking, remembering, and problem-solving 
Field Dependence/IndependenceCognitive style dimension measuring how individuals perceive and process information—analytically vs. holistically 
Observational LearningLearning by watching and imitating others' behaviors 
ModelingDemonstrating behaviors or thought processes for learners to observe and emulate 
Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL)Educational approach where learners actively investigate questions, problems, or scenarios 
Guided InquiryStructured inquiry where teacher provides guidance while students investigate 
Scientific TemperAn attitude of curiosity, critical thinking, and evidence-based reasoning

11.1 HOW CHILDREN THINK AND LEARN: EXPLORING DIFFERENT LEARNING STYLES AND INFORMATION PROCESSING


🧠 UNDERSTANDING LEARNING STYLES

What Are Learning Styles?

The concept of learning style is used to describe individual differences in the way people learn. Individual learners do not use exactly the same process of learning . The physiological processes and life experiences that shape learning allow for the emergence of unique individual adaptive processes that tend to emphasize some adaptive orientation over others .

Definition: "Learning styles" are the composite of characteristic cognitive, affective, and physiological factors that serve as relatively stable indicators of how a learner perceives, interacts with, and responds to the learning environment .

Why Learning Styles Matter in Teaching

ReasonExplanation
🎯 Individual DifferencesEvery student has a unique way of learning; one-size-fits-all teaching reaches only some students
📈 Improved OutcomesAccommodating learning styles can result in improved attitudes toward learning and increases in productivity, academic achievement, and creativity 
🤝 Student EngagementWhen teaching matches how students learn best, they are more motivated and engaged
🌍 DiversityLearning styles help teachers address the diverse needs of all learners

🧅 CURRY'S "ONION MODEL" OF LEARNING STYLES

In 1987, Lynn Curry developed a three-layer typology of learning style measures resembling the shape of an onion . This model helps us understand the different levels at which learning styles operate.

Visual Representation: Curry's Onion Model

text
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                                     │
│   ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│   │                                             │   │
│   │   Layer 4: INSTRUCTIONAL PREFERENCE         │   │
│   │   (Most observable, least stable)           │   │
│   │   ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐   │   │
│   │   │                                     │   │   │
│   │   │   Layer 3: SOCIAL INTERACTION        │   │   │
│   │   │   (How students interact)            │   │   │
│   │   │   ┌─────────────────────────────┐   │   │   │
│   │   │   │                             │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │   Layer 2: INFORMATION       │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │   PROCESSING                 │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │   (Intellectual approach)    │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │   ┌─────────────────────┐   │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │   │                     │   │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │   │  Layer 1:            │   │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │   │  PERSONALITY         │   │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │   │  (Core, most stable) │   │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │   │                     │   │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │   └─────────────────────┘   │   │   │   │
│   │   │   │                             │   │   │   │
│   │   │   └─────────────────────────────┘   │   │   │
│   │   │                                     │   │   │
│   │   └─────────────────────────────────────┘   │   │
│   │                                             │   │
│   └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                                                     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Layer 1: Personality Dimensions

The innermost layer represents learning style as measured by an individual's personality types . These are the most stable and fundamental influences on how we learn.

ModelDescription
Myers-Briggs Type IndicatorSuggests that the individual's way of learning is influenced by learner's personality type—extroversion vs. introversion, sensing vs. intuition, thinking vs. feeling, judging vs. perception 
Witkin Embedded Figure TestMeasures a learner's cognitive style in terms of field dependence and field independence 
Kagan's Matching Familiar Figure TestDetermines individual's impulsivity and reflectivity in a given situation 

Layer 2: Information-Processing Styles

The second layer centers around information-processing styles of learning—the individual's preferred intellectual approach to assimilating information .

ModelDescription
Kolb Learning Style InventoryBased on experiential learning theory, describing learning as holistic engagement of affective, perceptual, cognitive, and behavioral processes. Identifies preferences along two dimensions: concrete experience vs. abstract conceptualization, and reflective observation vs. active experimentation 
Schmeck's Inventory of Learning ProcessesIdentifies two types of learners: elaborative information processors and shallow information processors 
Hunt Paragraph Completion MethodMeasures a learner's conceptual complexity, interpersonal maturity, and self-other maturity 

Layer 3: Social Interaction

This layer addresses how students interact in the classroom .

ModelDescription
Grasha and Riechmann Student Learning Styles ScalesIdentifies students' learning behaviors along three bipolar dimensions: independent-dependent, avoidant-participant, and collaborative-competitive 

Layer 4: Instructional Preference

The outermost layer deals with learner's instructional preferences based on interaction with the educational teaching environment . These are the most observable and least stable aspects of learning style.

ModelDescription
Dunn and Dunn Learning Style InventoryMeasures environmental conditions under which students prefer to learn including environmental, physical, emotional, sociological, and psychological elements 
Canfield and Laffety Learning Styles InventoryIdentifies learner's instructional preferences based on conditions of learning, content of learning, mode of learning, and expectation of learning 

🔍 CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING STYLES

A useful approach for understanding and describing different learning styles is to classify them into different groups based on what the model measures or describes .

Categories of Learning Styles

CategoryDescriptionKey Questions
SensoryWhich senses do you learn best with?Do you learn better by hearing, seeing, doing, or writing? 
PerceptualRight-brain vs. left-brain dominanceAre you more right-brained (visual, intuitive, holistic) or left-brained (logical, sequential)? 
CognitiveHow you perceive, remember, think, and solve problemsDo you learn sequentially or randomly? 
PersonalityOutgoing vs. introspective; analytical vs. feelingDo you prefer working alone or with others? Are you competitive or cooperative? 
Information ProcessingHow information is obtained, sorted, stored, and utilizedWhat is your unique process for handling information? 
AffectivePersonality and emotional characteristicsAre you persistent? Responsible? Motivated? 
PhysiologicalBiologically-based factorsDoes background music help or distract you? 
ExperientialDeep vs. surface learning; motivationDo you learn for grades or personal commitment? 

⚠️ IMPORTANT NOTE FOR PSTET

While learning styles are a valuable concept for understanding individual differences, researchers note that there is no single, universally accepted definition of learning styles . The proliferation of diverse conceptualizations and instrumentation has posed challenges for achieving a coherent understanding .

For PSTET purposes, focus on:

  • Recognizing that children learn differently

  • Understanding major dimensions of learning styles

  • Applying this knowledge to create varied learning experiences

  • Avoiding rigid labeling of students


📝 PSTET EXAM FOCUS: SECTION 11.1

Question TypeExampleCorrect Answer
Definition"What are learning styles?"Individual differences in how people perceive, interact with, and respond to the learning environment 
Curry's Model"What are the four layers of Curry's onion model?"Personality, information-processing, social interaction, instructional preference 
Kolb's Theory"What are the two dimensions in Kolb's learning style model?"Concrete experience vs. abstract conceptualization; reflective observation vs. active experimentation 
Field Dependence"A student who perceives information holistically rather than analytically has which cognitive style?"Field dependent 

11.2 CHILDREN'S STRATEGIES OF LEARNING: OBSERVATION, IMITATION, EXPLORATION, AND ASKING QUESTIONS


🌱 NATURAL LEARNING STRATEGIES

Children are born learners. Long before formal schooling begins, they are actively acquiring knowledge and skills through natural strategies. Understanding these strategies helps teachers build on children's innate capabilities.

The Four Core Learning Strategies

StrategyDefinitionAge of Emergence
👀 ObservationWatching others and the environment to gather informationBirth onward
🔄 ImitationCopying behaviors, actions, or words of othersEarly infancy
🔍 ExplorationActively investigating the environment through senses and actionsInfancy onward
❓ QuestioningAsking others for information, explanations, or clarificationsToddlerhood onward

👀 OBSERVATION: LEARNING THROUGH WATCHING

The Power of Observation

Observation is one of the most fundamental learning strategies. Children constantly watch the world around them—people, animals, objects, and events—and derive meaning from what they see.

What Children Learn Through Observation

DomainExamples
Social BehaviorHow people interact, greet each other, express emotions
LanguageHow words are pronounced, sentence structure, conversational patterns
SkillsHow to use tools, tie shoes, pour water, draw shapes
Rules and NormsWhat is acceptable behavior in different settings
Cause and EffectWhat happens when certain actions occur

The Teacher's Role in Supporting Observation

StrategyImplementation
Model observationDemonstrate curiosity by wondering aloud and noticing details
Provide rich environmentsCreate classrooms with interesting things to observe
Guide attention"Look closely at... What do you notice?"
Give timeAllow unhurried time for observation
Discuss observationsTalk about what children notice and wonder

🔄 IMITATION: LEARNING THROUGH COPYING

The Role of Modeling

Research has examined the effects of adult models on children's learning strategies . Two types of modeling have been identified:

Model TypeDescriptionEffectiveness
Exemplary ModelsDemonstrate correct behaviors or answersEffective for children who already possess basic skills
Cognitive ModelsDemonstrate thinking processes, strategies, and reasoningMore effective for teaching new strategies and problem-solving approaches 

Research Findings on Modeling

Studies with children ages 6-11 analyzed two key issues :

  1. Comparative effectiveness of various modeling procedures for changing rule-governed behaviors

  2. Interaction between observational learning and the developmental level of the observing child

Key Conclusions :

FindingImplication for Teaching
Cognitive models are more effective than exemplary modelsDemonstrate your thinking process, not just the correct answer
Exemplary models can elicit constraint-seeking questions from children who already possess the skillUse demonstration for students ready to refine existing skills
Cognitive modeling is effective in bringing about constraint-seeking in children who don't yet possess component skillsModel step-by-step thinking for new learning
Cognitive models increase both constraint-seeking and problem-solving efficiencyThink-aloud strategies improve learning outcomes

Constraint-Seeking Questions

Constraint-seeking questions help in "narrowing in" on a correct answer by systematically eliminating possibilities . For example, in a guessing game, a constraint-seeking question would be "Is it an animal?" rather than "Is it a dog?"

The Teacher as Cognitive Model

StrategyExample
Think-alouds"I'm wondering... First I'll try... Now I see that... So I think..."
Demonstrate problem-solving steps"When I solve this type of problem, I always start by..."
Show multiple strategies"There are different ways to figure this out. One way is... Another way is..."
Make mistakes visible"Oops, that didn't work. Let me think about why and try something else."

🔍 EXPLORATION: LEARNING THROUGH ACTIVE INVESTIGATION

The Exploratory Drive

Children are natural explorers. From the moment they can move, they investigate their environment through touch, taste, manipulation, and experimentation.

The REAL Learning Framework

A practical approach to exploratory learning involves five stages :

StageDescriptionClassroom Application
Explore – experience, observeWatch, notice, wonder, ask questionsProvide hands-on experiences; encourage observation 
Expand – read, researchSeek information from books, experts, resourcesLibrary visits, guest speakers, online research 
Draw – represent visuallyIllustrate, diagram, create visual representationsDrawing, painting, modeling 
Write – practice, vocabularyRecord ideas, learn new wordsJournals, word banks, labeling 
Create – project, product, essaySynthesize learning in a final productModels, reports, presentations 

Example: Learning About Ants 

StageActivity
ExploreWatch ants on the sidewalk. Ask questions: How many? Where are they going? What do they eat?
ExpandGo to library, read about ants, find interesting facts
DrawDraw ants—three body segments; experiment with shapes
WriteLearn and practice writing words: insect, ant hill, nest, colony
CreateMake an ant farm; create a model; write about ant colonies

Key Insight: "The secret is to make connections at every step. Connect new information to existing knowledge. Connections equal retention. Retention equals learning." 


❓ QUESTIONING: LEARNING THROUGH INQUIRY

The Power of Questions

Children's questions are windows into their thinking. They reveal curiosity, confusion, and the active construction of understanding.

Types of Questions Children Ask

Question TypePurposeExample
FactualSeek specific information"What do ants eat?"
ExplanatorySeek understanding of causes/reasons"Why is the sky blue?"
HypotheticalExplore possibilities"What would happen if it never rained?"
ClarifyingResolve confusion"Do you mean like this?"
ProceduralUnderstand how to do something"How do I make the paint stick?"

Encouraging Questioning in the Classroom

StrategyImplementation
Create a question-friendly cultureValue all questions; never dismiss or ridicule
Model questioningWonder aloud; ask authentic questions yourself
Use a "Wonder Wall"Display children's questions at eye level 
Provide thinking routinesSee-Think-Wonder; I Notice-I Wonder-It Makes Me Think 
Build time for inquiryMake space in the day for children to pursue their questions 
Honor child-led inquiryLet children follow their curiosities, even when not tied to set curriculum 

🤝 SUPPORTING COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH

Young children can engage in research when given appropriate support .

Seven Practical Ways to Support Young Researchers 

StrategyDescription
1. Expand entry pointsUse videos, images, expert visitors, podcasts, and hands-on materials—not just text
2. Multiple modalities for demonstrating understandingDrawing, building, dictation, dramatization, storytelling
3. Model the inquiry processEngage in co-research alongside students; wonder aloud
4. Make thinking visibleShared journals, anchor charts, photo documentation, thinking routines
5. Bring in experts and plan fieldworkMeet experts; visit workplaces beyond classroom
6. Make space for child-led inquiryWonder Wall; flexible curriculum to pursue questions
7. Support collaborative researchChildren learn alongside each other, asking questions and figuring things out together

Key Insight: "When we expand our understanding of research, we begin to see how young children already engage in research every day—through their questions, observations, play, and investigations." 


📝 PSTET EXAM FOCUS: SECTION 11.2

Question TypeExampleCorrect Answer
Learning Strategies"What are four natural learning strategies children use?"Observation, imitation, exploration, questioning
Modeling Types"Which type of modeling is more effective for teaching new problem-solving strategies?"Cognitive modeling 
REAL Framework"What are the five stages of the REAL learning framework?"Explore, Expand, Draw, Write, Create 
Supporting Research"How can teachers support young children's research?"Expand entry points, multiple modalities, model inquiry, make thinking visible 

11.3 WHY CHILDREN 'FAIL' TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS IN SCHOOL PERFORMANCE


🌍 MOVING BEYOND THE INDIVIDUAL CHILD

When children struggle in school, the immediate tendency is often to focus on the individual child—their effort, ability, or motivation. However, research demonstrates that underachievement is rarely the result of a single factor. It emerges from the cumulative and intersecting effects of multiple determinants that shape children's educational pathways .

Key Insight: Early school leaving and underachievement are outcomes of a complex interplay between structural, individual, and relational determinants .


📊 A SCOPING REVIEW: FOUR MAJOR FACTORS

A comprehensive scoping review of factors contributing to learner under-performance identified four major categories of influence .

Visual Framework: Factors Influencing Learner Under-Performance

text
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    LEARNER UNDER-PERFORMANCE                     │
│                           ║                                       │
│     ╔═══════════════╦═══════════════╦═══════════════╦══════════╗ │
│     ║               ║               ║               ║          ║ │
│ ╔══════╗       ╔══════╗       ╔══════╗       ╔══════╗      ╔══════╗
│ ║ 1.   ║       ║ 2.   ║       ║ 3.   ║       ║ 4.   ║      ║ 5.   ║
│ ║Subject║       ║Personal║       ║School║       ║Systemic║      ║Intersect-║
│ ║Content║       ║& Social║       ║Leader-║       ║Barriers║      ║ing      ║
│ ║&      ║       ║Challenges║       ║ship   ║       ║        ║      ║Determin-║
│ ║Teacher║       ║        ║       ║&      ║       ║        ║      ║ants     ║
│ ║Pedagogy║       ║        ║       ║Manage-║       ║        ║      ║         ║
│ ║       ║       ║        ║       ║ment   ║       ║        ║      ║         ║
│ ╚══════╝       ╚══════╝       ╚══════╝       ╚══════╝      ╚══════╝
│     ║               ║               ║               ║          ║ │
│     ╚═══════════════╩═══════════════╩═══════════════╩══════════╝ │
│                           ║                                       │
│              All factors interact and compound                     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

FACTOR 1: SUBJECT CONTENT AND TEACHER PEDAGOGY

Difficult Subjects and Ineffective Teaching Methods

The first major factor influencing learner under-performance relates to subject content and teacher pedagogy .

IssueDescription
Difficult subject matterContent that is poorly sequenced or developmentally inappropriate
Ineffective teaching methodsPedagogy that fails to engage students or address diverse learning needs
Lack of learner-centered strategiesOveremphasis on teacher development at expense of learner-centered approaches 
Inadequate scaffoldingInsufficient support for students struggling with new concepts

Examples from Research

The review found that previous research and interventions have predominantly focused on specific subjects, such as mathematics, natural sciences, and languages, which are critical areas linked to learners' under-performance .

Teacher Development vs. Learner-Centered Strategies

An important finding was that under-performance can be attributed, in part, to a disproportionate focus on teacher development at the expense of learner-centred strategies . While teacher development is important, it must be balanced with approaches that directly address how students learn.


FACTOR 2: LEARNERS' PERSONAL AND SOCIAL CHALLENGES

Personal and Social Factors Affecting Learning

The review identified learners' personal and social challenges as a major category of influence . These include:

Challenge CategoryExamples
Personal challengesHealth issues, emotional difficulties, low self-esteem, learning disabilities
Social challengesFamily problems, peer relationships, community environment
Psychosocial well-beingStress, trauma, bullying, mental health concerns 

The Impact of Psychosocial Well-Being

Key Finding: "Stress, trauma, bullying, and low self-esteem make it hard for students to focus and persist. Safe, supportive environments and access to mental health support are essential for learning." 


FACTOR 3: SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES

The Role of School Leadership

School leadership and management issues significantly impact learner outcomes .

IssueImpact
Weak school leadershipLack of vision, poor instructional guidance
Ineffective managementDisorganization, poor resource allocation
School climateUnwelcoming environment, low expectations
Limited support servicesInadequate counseling, learning support

Institutional Environment

Key Finding: "Rigid curricula, limited support services, and exclusionary policies can unintentionally push vulnerable students out. School expectations and teacher attitudes strongly shape whether students feel school is relevant and achievable." 


FACTOR 4: SYSTEMIC BARRIERS

Broader System-Wide Problems

Systemic barriers represent the fourth major factor . These are structural issues beyond individual schools or teachers.

Systemic BarrierDescription
Policy-practice gapsPolicies exist but implementation is weak
Resource inequitiesUnequal distribution of resources across schools
Curriculum issuesNational curriculum that may not meet diverse needs
Assessment systemsStandardized testing that may not reflect true learning

🌐 THE COMPLEX INTERPLAY OF SOCIAL DETERMINANTS

The SCIREARLY project provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the multiple factors influencing educational outcomes .

Key Determinants of Educational Outcomes

DeterminantDescriptionEducational Impact
Early childhood education and careUnequal access to high-quality early years provisionCreates early gaps in language, social, and thinking skills 
Cognitive factorsLearning difficulties, attention challenges, unmet special educational needsCan lead to disengagement if not identified early and well supported 
Institutional environmentRigid curricula, limited support services, exclusionary policiesCan unintentionally push vulnerable students out 
Socio-economic conditionsPoverty, unstable family work, few learning resources at homeReduces students' chances to stay engaged with school 
Cultural influencesSchool norms clash with home values; minority identities devaluedStudents may feel they don't belong 
Linguistic factorsMinority language at home, recent migration, weak language supportSlows literacy and learning 
Gender dynamicsBoys over-represented due to behavior expectations; girls face role-related barriersNeed for gender-responsive approaches 
Psychosocial well-beingStress, trauma, bullying, low self-esteemMakes it hard to focus and persist 

🔍 IMPORTANT INSIGHTS FOR TEACHERS

1. Under-Performance is Multifactorial

Failure is rarely due to a single cause. Multiple factors interact and compound .

2. Prevention is Better Than Remediation

Investing in early intervention yields disproportionate returns in terms of retention, achievement, and future employability .

3. Look Beyond the Child

When a child struggles, examine:

  • Pedagogical approaches (Is teaching effective?)

  • Institutional factors (Is the school environment supportive?)

  • Systemic issues (Are there broader barriers?)

  • Personal/social challenges (What else is happening in the child's life?)

4. All Students Benefit from Inclusive Practices

Strategies designed to support marginalized students often benefit all students. By recognizing patterns, we can support our marginalised students as well as our wider community of students.


📝 PSTET EXAM FOCUS: SECTION 11.3

Question TypeExampleCorrect Answer
Four Factors"What four factors influence learner under-performance?"Subject content/teacher pedagogy; personal/social challenges; school leadership; systemic barriers 
Social Determinants"What social determinants affect educational outcomes?"Early childhood education, cognitive factors, institutional environment, socio-economic conditions, cultural influences, linguistic factors, gender dynamics, psychosocial well-being 
Key Principle"What should teachers remember about under-performance?"It is rarely due to a single factor; multiple determinants interact 
Teacher Development"What can happen if teacher development is prioritized over learner-centered strategies?"Under-performance may persist despite teacher training 

11.4 CHILD AS A PROBLEM SOLVER AND 'SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATOR': ENCOURAGING INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING


🔬 THE CHILD AS NATURAL SCIENTIST

Children are born with an innate drive to understand their world. They observe, question, experiment, and draw conclusions—the very essence of scientific investigation.

Key Insight: At five, science is exploratory. The goal is to get children curious about the world around them .


🧪 WHAT IS INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING?

Definition

Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) is an educational approach where learners actively investigate questions, problems, or scenarios . Rather than passively receiving information, students construct understanding through active exploration.

Types of Inquiry

TypeDescriptionTeacher RoleStudent Role
Guided InquiryTeacher provides structure and guidance while students investigateProvides framework, resources, and supportInvestigates within structured parameters 
Open InquiryStudents develop their own questions and investigation methodsFacilitator, resource providerDesigns and conducts own investigation
Structured InquiryTeacher provides question and procedure; students find conclusionProvides step-by-step guidanceFollows procedure to reach conclusion

📚 RESEARCH EVIDENCE: IBL IN PRIMARY GRADES

A study of Inquiry-Based Learning activities with third graders (8-9-year-old pupils) investigated whether project-based teaching using IBL activities was significantly more efficient than traditional (instructivist) teaching .

The Study Design

AspectDetails
TopicTemperature Measurement
Participants60 third graders divided into experimental group (30) and control group (30)
Experimental GroupIBL activities with Integrated e-Learning (INTe-L) including on-site experiments, remote experiments, interactive simulations, electronic study materials 
Control GroupTraditional (instructivist) teaching
AssessmentPre-test and post-test

Key Findings

FindingResult
Knowledge acquisitionExperimental group showed 24% increase compared to control group 
Conceptual understandingDeeper conceptual understanding of temperature 
Key competenciesGained skills in discussion and presentation of results 
Interest in scienceIncreased pupils' interest in Science in general 
Interdisciplinary understandingHelped them understand links between different subjects 

Research Conclusion

"The study has shown that complex IBL activities can be successfully applied at primary school 3rd grade level already." 


🏗️ THE INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING FRAMEWORK

Components of Effective IBL

The study used an Integrated e-Learning (INTe-L) strategy built on :

ComponentDescription
On-site and remote experimentsHands-on and technology-facilitated experimentation
Interactive simulationsComputer-based models of scientific phenomena
Electronic study materialsDigital resources supporting investigation

Forms of Research for Young Children

For children in pre-K through second grade, research can take three forms :

FormDescriptionExample
InvestigationLooking closely, asking questions, gathering information through authentic experiencesObserving a worm bin to learn about composting 
ExperimentationTesting ideas and taking risksBuilding a structure that doesn't fall; mixing ingredients to make paint 
ExplorationLearning through playSetting up a pretend store; designing products or inventions 

🛠️ PRACTICAL STRATEGIES FOR IBL IN THE CLASSROOM

Strategy 1: Use Multiple Modalities

Young children learn deeply when they have the chance to explore ideas through a variety of formats—not just text .

ModalityExamples
Expert visitorsGuest speakers with relevant expertise
PodcastsChild-friendly audio content
VideosShort, engaging visual content
ImagesPhotographs, gallery walks
Hands-on materialsAuthentic objects for exploration

Strategy 2: Support Multiple Ways of Demonstrating Understanding

Given young children's emergent literacy skills, consider having them represent and express their learning through :

  • Drawing

  • Building

  • Dictation

  • Dramatization

  • Storytelling

Key Insight: "Literacy involves more than reading and writing—it's also about speaking, listening, asking questions, and making sense of the world." 

Strategy 3: Model the Inquiry Process

Although young children are naturally curious, they may need support in seeing what curiosity looks like. Model this often by engaging in co-research alongside your students .

Example: In a unit where children were designing accessible playground equipment, the teacher brought them to the playground and wondered aloud:

"How could a child who uses a wheelchair enjoy this swing? What features might make this play structure welcoming for everyone?" 

Strategy 4: Make Thinking Visible

Use tools to help children revisit and build on their ideas :

ToolPurpose
Shared journalsDocument collective thinking
Anchor chartsRecord and display learning
Photo documentationCapture and revisit experiences
Thinking routinesSee-Think-Wonder; Parts-Purposes-Complexities 

Strategy 5: Create a Wonder-Filled Environment

StrategyImplementation
Wonder WallDisplay children's questions at eye level 
Inquiry BoardSpace to post and revisit questions
Flexible timeBuild moments when curriculum is spacious enough to explore questions 
Child-led inquiryLet students pursue curiosities not tied to set curriculum 

Strategy 6: Support Collaborative Research

Give children chances to learn alongside each other—asking questions, sharing ideas, and figuring things out together .

ApproachBenefit
Small group workDeeper learning through collaboration
Shared goalsJoyful collective investigation
Peer learningChildren learn from each other's questions and ideas

🌟 FOSTERING SCIENTIFIC TEMPER

What is Scientific Temper?

Scientific temper refers to an attitude of:

  • Curiosity and wonder

  • Critical thinking

  • Evidence-based reasoning

  • Openness to new ideas

  • Willingness to revise beliefs based on evidence

How Teachers Can Foster Scientific Temper

StrategyImplementation
Encourage questionsValue all questions; help children pursue them
Model curiosityWonder aloud; show excitement about discovery
Celebrate mistakesTreat errors as learning opportunities
Require evidence"How do you know? What evidence do you have?"
Teach thinking skillsObservation, comparison, classification, prediction
Provide time for explorationUnhurried investigation and discovery

📝 PSTET EXAM FOCUS: SECTION 11.4

Question TypeExampleCorrect Answer
Definition"What is Inquiry-Based Learning?"Educational approach where learners actively investigate questions, problems, or scenarios 
Research Finding"What did the IBL study with third graders find?"24% increase in knowledge acquisition compared to traditional teaching 
Forms of Research"What three forms can research take for young children?"Investigation, experimentation, exploration 
Modalities"What modalities support young children's inquiry?"Expert visitors, podcasts, videos, images, hands-on materials 

✅ CHAPTER SUMMARY: KEY TAKEAWAYS

SectionKey Points
11.1 Learning StylesLearning styles describe individual differences in how people learn . Curry's onion model has four layers: personality, information-processing, social interaction, instructional preference .
11.2 Children's Learning StrategiesChildren learn naturally through observation, imitation, exploration, and questioning. Cognitive modeling is more effective than exemplary models for teaching new strategies . The REAL framework includes Explore, Expand, Draw, Write, Create .
11.3 Why Children FailUnder-performance results from multiple interacting factors: subject content/pedagogy, personal/social challenges, school leadership, systemic barriers . Social determinants include early childhood education, cognitive factors, institutional environment, socio-economic conditions, culture, language, gender, and psychosocial well-being .
11.4 Child as Scientific InvestigatorIBL positions children as active investigators. Research shows IBL increases knowledge acquisition by 24% compared to traditional teaching . Support young researchers through multiple modalities, varied expression, modeling, visible thinking, and collaborative research .

📝 PRACTICE QUESTIONS FOR PSTET

Multiple Choice Questions

1. According to Curry's onion model, which layer represents the most stable and fundamental influence on learning?
a) Instructional preference
b) Social interaction
c) Information processing
d) Personality dimensions

Answer: d) Personality dimensions 


2. Research on modeling found that which type of model is more effective for teaching new problem-solving strategies?
a) Exemplary models
b) Cognitive models
c) Peer models
d) Reward-based models

Answer: b) Cognitive models 


3. According to the REAL learning framework, after exploring and expanding, what is the next stage?
a) Write
b) Create
c) Draw
d) Reflect

Answer: c) Draw 


4. A scoping review of learner under-performance identified how many major factors?
a) Two
b) Three
c) Four
d) Five

Answer: c) Four 


5. Research on Inquiry-Based Learning with third graders found that IBL increased knowledge acquisition by:
a) 10%
b) 15%
c) 20%
d) 24%

Answer: d) 24% 


6. Which of the following is NOT one of the four factors influencing learner under-performance identified in the scoping review?
a) Subject content and teacher pedagogy
b) Learners' personal and social challenges
c) Parental education level
d) Systemic barriers

Answer: c) Parental education level 


7. According to the SCIREARLY project, which determinant affects educational outcomes through early gaps in language, social, and thinking skills?
a) Cognitive factors
b) Early childhood education and care
c) Socio-economic conditions
d) Linguistic factors

Answer: b) Early childhood education and care 


8. For young children in pre-K through second grade, which is NOT identified as a form of research?
a) Investigation
b) Experimentation
c) Memorization
d) Exploration

Answer: c) Memorization 


9. The Integrated e-Learning (INTe-L) strategy used in IBL research included all of the following EXCEPT:
a) On-site experiments
b) Interactive simulations
c) Standardized tests
d) Electronic study materials

Answer: c) Standardized tests 


10. What percentage of Grade 8 learners failed mathematics in some South African provinces according to the 2024 report?
a) 55.5%
b) 65.5%
c) 75.5%
d) 85.5%

Answer: d) 85.5% 


Short Answer Questions

11. Describe Curry's onion model of learning styles and explain its four layers.

Answer: Curry's onion model (1987) organizes learning style measures into four layers resembling an onion :

  • Layer 1 (Innermost - Personality): The most stable layer, representing basic personality influences on learning. Includes Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Witkin's field dependence/independence.

  • Layer 2 (Information-Processing): Individual's preferred intellectual approach to assimilating information. Includes Kolb's Learning Style Inventory and Schmeck's Inventory of Learning Processes.

  • Layer 3 (Social Interaction): How students interact in the classroom. Includes Grasha and Riechmann's learning styles scales.

  • Layer 4 (Outermost - Instructional Preference): The most observable, least stable layer, representing preferences for specific learning environments and methods. Includes Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Inventory.


12. Explain the difference between exemplary models and cognitive models, and describe which is more effective for teaching new problem-solving strategies.

Answer: Research on modeling identified two types :

  • Exemplary models: Demonstrate correct behaviors or answers. Effective for children who already possess basic skills, as they can elicit constraint-seeking questions from children who already have the generalized format within their repertoires.

  • Cognitive models: Demonstrate thinking processes, strategies, and reasoning. More effective for teaching new problem-solving strategies because they bring about constraint-seeking in children who don't yet possess component skills. Cognitive models also increase both constraint-seeking and problem-solving efficiency.

Cognitive models are more effective for teaching new strategies because they make the thinking process visible, allowing children to internalize problem-solving approaches.


13. What four major factors influence learner under-performance according to the scoping review? Provide examples of each.

Answer: The scoping review identified four major factors :

  1. Subject content and teacher pedagogy: Difficult subjects, ineffective teaching methods, lack of learner-centered strategies, inadequate scaffolding. Example: Mathematics instruction that fails to engage students or connect to their experiences.

  2. Learners' personal and social challenges: Health issues, emotional difficulties, family problems, peer relationships. Example: A child experiencing bullying who cannot focus on learning.

  3. School leadership and management issues: Weak leadership, ineffective management, poor school climate, limited support services. Example: A school with no counseling services for struggling students.

  4. Systemic barriers: Policy-practice gaps, resource inequities, curriculum issues, assessment systems. Example: Unequal distribution of resources between urban and rural schools.


14. What did research on Inquiry-Based Learning with third graders reveal about its effectiveness? Describe the key findings.

Answer: Research on IBL with third graders (8-9 years old) investigating temperature measurement revealed :

  • 24% increase in knowledge acquisition compared to traditional (instructivist) teaching

  • Deeper conceptual understanding of temperature

  • Development of key competencies including discussion and presentation of results

  • Increased pupils' interest in Science in general

  • Helped students understand links between different subjects

The study concluded that complex IBL activities can be successfully applied at primary school 3rd grade level already. The Integrated e-Learning (INTe-L) strategy used on-site experiments, remote experiments, interactive simulations, and electronic study materials to support inquiry.


🎯 FINAL EXAM TIPS

  1. 🔍 Know Curry's onion model—personality (innermost), information-processing, social interaction, instructional preference (outermost) 

  2. 📖 Understand modeling types—exemplary vs. cognitive; cognitive models more effective for new strategies 

  3. 📊 Remember the four factors of under-performance—subject/pedagogy, personal/social, leadership, systemic 

  4. 🌟 Know IBL research findings—24% increase in learning 

  5. 🏫 Apply REAL framework—Explore, Expand, Draw, Write, Create 

  6. 🌍 Understand social determinants—multiple interacting factors 

  7. 👧 Support young researchers—multiple modalities, varied expression, modeling, visible thinking, collaboration 


📖 MNEMONICS TO REMEMBER

For Curry's Onion Layers (inner to outer): People Inform Social Instruction - Personality, Information-processing, Social interaction, Instructional preference

For REAL Framework: REAL = Really Engaging Active Learning

  • Explore

  • Expand

  • Draw

  • Write

  • Create

For Four Factors of Under-performance: Subject, Personal, Leadership, Systemic - Students Progress Less Sometimes

For IBL Benefits: Deeper understanding, Interest, Skills, Connections - Discover Interesting Scientific Connections


📝 NOTES SECTION

text
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________

🔜 COMING UP IN CHAPTER 12

In the next chapter, we will explore The Teaching-Learning Process—understanding the dynamic interaction between teacher, student, and content, learning as a social activity, alternative conceptions, and the importance of children's errors in the learning process.


Happy Learning! Best Wishes for Your PSTET Preparation! 📚✨