Tuesday, 24 February 2026

Ch 30: Evaluation in Science 📝

0 comments

 

Chapter 30: Evaluation in Science 📝

Introduction

Evaluation is the systematic process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting evidence of student learning. It is not just about giving tests—it is about understanding what students know, can do, and value, and using that information to improve teaching and learning .


30.1 Purposes of Evaluation

PurposeDescription
DiagnosticIdentify strengths and weaknesses before instruction
FormativeMonitor learning during instruction (ongoing feedback)
SummativeAssess learning at end of unit/course (grades)
PlacementDetermine appropriate level or group for student
EvaluativeJudge effectiveness of curriculum/teaching

30.2 Types of Evaluation

A. Based on Timing

TypeWhenPurpose
Placement EvaluationBefore instructionDetermine prior knowledge
Formative EvaluationDuring instructionMonitor progress; adjust teaching
Summative EvaluationEnd of instructionAssign grades; certify learning
Diagnostic EvaluationWhen difficulties appearIdentify specific learning problems

B. Based on Reference

TypeDescriptionExample
Norm-ReferencedCompares student to others"You scored above 80% of students"
Criterion-ReferencedCompares student to fixed standard"You scored 85%, passing is 70%"

30.3 Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)

CCE was introduced in India (by CBSE) to shift focus from only summative assessment to ongoing, holistic evaluation .

AspectDescription
ContinuousRegular, periodic assessment throughout the year
ComprehensiveCovers all aspects—scholastic (subjects) and co-scholastic (life skills, attitudes, values)

Components of CCE:

  • Scholastic Areas: Subject knowledge (tests, assignments)

  • Co-scholastic Areas: Life skills, attitudes, values, participation in activities

  • Co-curricular Activities: Sports, arts, clubs


30.4 Tools of Evaluation

A. Observation

ToolDescriptionUse
Observation ScheduleStructured observation formRecord specific behaviors
Anecdotal RecordBrief narrative of significant incidentCapture unusual behavior/achievement

B. Written Tests

TypeDescriptionExample
Objective TypeSingle correct answerMultiple choice, true/false, matching
Short AnswerBrief response (1-5 sentences)Define, explain briefly
Essay TypeExtended responseDiscuss, analyze, compare

C. Practical Assessment

ToolDescriptionAssesses
Practical ExamHands-on taskPsychomotor skills, process skills
Lab NotebookRecord of experimentsObservation, recording skills

D. Other Tools

ToolDescriptionUse
ChecklistList of criteria to checkSkill assessment
Rating ScaleScale (e.g., 1-5) to rate qualityAttitude, participation
PortfolioCollection of student work over timeGrowth, reflection
ProjectsExtended investigationResearch, presentation skills
RubricScoring guide with criteriaConsistent grading

30.5 Assessing Different Domains

A. Cognitive Domain

LevelAssessment Method
RememberMCQ, define, list
UnderstandExplain, summarize, give example
ApplySolve problem, demonstrate
AnalyzeCompare, contrast, categorize
EvaluateCritique, justify, recommend
CreateDesign, construct, develop

B. Psychomotor Domain

LevelAssessment Method
ImitationObservation checklist
ManipulationPractical task with instructions
PrecisionPractical task independently
ArticulationComplex task with multiple steps
NaturalizationAutomatic, skilled performance

C. Affective Domain

LevelAssessment Method
ReceivingObservation, checklist
RespondingParticipation records
ValuingSelf-report, interviews
OrganizationReflection journals, discussions
CharacterizationObservation over time, portfolio

30.6 Characteristics of Good Evaluation

CharacteristicDescription
ValidityMeasures what it claims to measure
ReliabilityConsistent results over time
ObjectivityFree from personal bias
ComprehensivenessCovers all important aspects
PracticalityFeasible in terms of time, cost, effort
FairnessEquitable for all students

30.7 Pedagogical Implications

ImplicationClassroom Practice
Use multiple toolsTests + observation + projects
Assess regularlyNot just at end of term
Share criteriaTell students how they'll be assessed
Give feedbackSpecific, constructive, timely
Use results to improveAdjust teaching based on outcomes