Saturday, 21 February 2026

CH5 : MORAL DEVELOPMENT: KOHLBERG'S THEORY

0 comments

 

📚 PART I: FOUNDATIONS OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT

CHAPTER 5: MORAL DEVELOPMENT: KOHLBERG'S THEORY


📖 CHAPTER OVERVIEW

SectionTopicPSTET WeightagePage No.
5.1Lawrence Kohlberg's Theory of Moral DevelopmentVery High1
5.2Levels and Stages of Moral DevelopmentVery High6
5.3Critical Perspectives on Kohlberg's TheoryHigh22
5.4Classroom Relevance and ApplicationsHigh28

🎯 LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completing this chapter, you will be able to:

  • ✅ Explain Kohlberg's key concept of moral reasoning

  • ✅ Describe all three levels and six stages of moral development with examples

  • ✅ Understand how individuals progress through the stages

  • ✅ Analyze critical perspectives including Gilligan's critique

  • ✅ Apply Kohlberg's theory to classroom situations for PSTET

  • ✅ Use moral dilemmas to promote moral development in students


🔑 KEY TERMS TO REMEMBER

TermQuick Definition
Moral ReasoningThe thinking process involved in deciding whether an action is right or wrong 
Moral DilemmaA situation with no obvious right or wrong solution that requires moral judgment 
Preconventional LevelMorality externally controlled; focus on consequences (punishment/reward) 
Conventional LevelFocus on social relationships, rules, and maintaining social order 
Postconventional LevelMorality based on abstract principles and universal values 
Heinz DilemmaKohlberg's famous moral dilemma about stealing a drug to save a dying wife
Social ContractView that laws are flexible agreements that should serve the greater good 
Universal Ethical PrinciplesSelf-chosen principles of justice, equality, and human rights 

5.1 LAWRENCE KOHLBERG'S THEORY OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT


🧠 INTRODUCTION TO KOHLBERG

Who Was Lawrence Kohlberg?

Lawrence Kohlberg (1927-1987) was an American developmental psychologist who built upon Jean Piaget's work on moral judgment in children . In 1958, Kohlberg developed his comprehensive stage theory of moral development, which became one of the most influential theories in psychology and education .

Core Principles of Kohlberg's Theory

PrincipleDescription
🧠 Cognitive in NatureFocuses on the thinking process when deciding if a behavior is right or wrong, not the decision itself or actual behavior 
🔢 Stage-Based DevelopmentMoral reasoning develops through six sequential stages arranged in three levels 
📈 Invariant SequenceStages occur in fixed order; no stage can be skipped 
🌍 UniversalStages appear across cultures, though rates of development vary 
🧑‍🎓 Active ParticipantIndividual is an active participant in moral development, not a passive recipient 

🔬 KOHLBERG'S METHODOLOGY

The Moral Dilemma Approach

Kohlberg investigated moral judgments by using predefined dilemmas with no obvious right or wrong solution . His most famous is the Heinz Dilemma.

The Heinz Dilemma 📖

text
In Europe, a woman was near death from a rare cancer. There was one drug that doctors thought might save her. 
It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, 
but the druggist was charging 10 times what it cost him to make it. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 
for a small dose. Heinz, the sick woman's husband, borrowed money from everyone he knew but could only raise $1,000. 
He told the druggist his wife was dying and begged him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said, 
"No, I discovered the drug and I'm going to make money from it." Heinz became desperate and broke into the 
druggist's laboratory to steal the drug for his wife.

**Should Heinz have stolen the drug? WHY?**

How Kohlberg Analyzed Responses

AspectDescription
Not the DecisionKohlberg didn't care about "yes" or "no" answers
The ReasoningHe focused on WHY the person made their choice 
Stage IdentificationResponses were analyzed for characteristics typical of each stage 
Moral Judgment InterviewStructured interview requiring trained scorers 

5.2 LEVELS AND STAGES OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT


📊 THE THREE LEVELS AND SIX STAGES

Kohlberg organized his six stages into three general levels of moral development . Each level represents a fundamentally different way of thinking about right and wrong.

LevelAge RangeFocusStages
1. Preconventional0-9 yearsExternal consequences (punishment/reward) Stage 1 & 2
2. Conventional10-15 yearsSocial relationships, rules, social order Stage 3 & 4
3. Postconventional16+ yearsAbstract principles, universal ethics Stage 5 & 6

LEVEL 1: PRECONVENTIONAL MORALITY (AGES 0-9)

At the preconventional level, morality is externally controlled . Children conform to rules imposed by authority figures to avoid punishment or receive rewards. Thinking is egocentric, and behavior aligns with obtaining pleasure and avoiding pain .


STAGE 1: OBEDIENCE AND PUNISHMENT ORIENTATION

AspectDescription
Core Question"What will happen to me?"
FocusAvoiding punishment 
ReasoningBehavior is determined by consequences. The individual obeys to avoid punishment. 
View of RulesRules are fixed and absolute; obeying them avoids punishment
Age GroupTypically young children

Stage 1 Examples

SituationStage 1 Reasoning
Not stealing"I won't steal because I'll get spanked."
Doing homework"I have to do my homework or the teacher will yell at me."
Telling truth"I told the truth because I didn't want to get in trouble for lying."
Sharing toys"I share because if I don't, mom will take my toys away."

Classroom Example 🏫

A child in Stage 1 follows classroom rules only when the teacher is watching. When the teacher leaves the room, the child misbehaves because the threat of punishment is temporarily absent.


STAGE 2: INDIVIDUALISM AND EXCHANGE (INSTRUMENTAL PURPOSE)

AspectDescription
Core Question"What's in it for me?" 
FocusSatisfying personal needs; receiving rewards 
ReasoningRight action is what serves one's own interests. Reciprocity is understood as "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours." 
FairnessNotions of fairness emerge but are interpreted practically and physically 

Stage 2 Examples

SituationStage 2 Reasoning
Sharing"I'll share my snack with you if you share yours with me."
Helping"I helped my friend so he'll help me tomorrow."
Not stealing"If I steal, I might get caught and lose my TV privileges."
Doing chores"I'll clean my room if I get allowance."

Classroom Example 🏫

A student offers to help the teacher clean the classroom, but expects extra recess time in return. The child's moral reasoning is based on mutual benefit and personal gain .

The Heinz Dilemma at Stage 2

A person at Stage 2 might say: "Heinz should steal the drug because he needs his wife. If she dies, he'll have to find someone else, and that would be hard." OR "He shouldn't steal because he might get caught and go to jail, which would be worse than his wife dying."


LEVEL 2: CONVENTIONAL MORALITY (AGES 10-15)

At the conventional level, conformity to social rules remains important . However, the emphasis shifts from self-interest to relationships with others and social systems . The individual strives to support rules set forth by others to win approval or maintain social order .


STAGE 3: INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS (GOOD BOY/NICE GIRL)

AspectDescription
Core Question"How will others see me?"
FocusSocial approval; being seen as "good" 
ReasoningBehavior is determined by what earns approval from others. The individual wants to maintain relationships and be perceived positively. 
Key ValueTrust, caring, loyalty to others

Stage 3 Examples

SituationStage 3 Reasoning
Honesty"I told the truth because my parents trust me and I don't want to disappoint them."
Helping"I helped my friend because that's what good friends do."
Following rules"I follow classroom rules because I want my teacher to think I'm a good student."
Not cheating"I didn't cheat because my classmates would think I'm dishonest."

Classroom Example 🏫

A middle school student volunteers to help a new student adjust to the school. The child's motivation stems from wanting to be seen as kind and helpful by peers and teachers, and to build a positive relationship.

The Heinz Dilemma at Stage 3

A person at Stage 3 might say: "Heinz should steal the drug because he's a good husband who loves his wife. If he didn't try to save her, people would think he's heartless." OR "He shouldn't steal because the druggist trusted him not to break in. Stealing would make him untrustworthy."


STAGE 4: MAINTAINING SOCIAL ORDER (LAW AND ORDER)

AspectDescription
Core Question"What if everyone did that?"
FocusSocial rules, laws, and maintaining order 
ReasoningThe individual takes into consideration a larger perspective—that of societal laws. Rules and laws maintain social order worth preserving. 
DutyDoing one's duty, respecting authority, following rules for their own sake 

Stage 4 Examples

SituationStage 4 Reasoning
Following laws"I follow traffic laws because if everyone ignored them, there would be chaos on the roads."
Not stealing"Stealing is wrong because laws exist to protect everyone's property."
Paying taxes"I pay taxes because it's my duty as a citizen to contribute to society."
School rules"School rules must be followed because they create an orderly learning environment for everyone."

Classroom Example 🏫

A high school student serves on the student council and advocates for following school policies. The student believes rules are necessary for the school to function properly and that everyone has a responsibility to uphold them.

The Heinz Dilemma at Stage 4

A person at Stage 4 might say: "Heinz should not steal the drug because stealing is against the law. If everyone stole whenever they needed something, society would break down." OR "Heinz should steal it, but then turn himself in to face the legal consequences because we must respect the law."


LEVEL 3: POSTCONVENTIONAL MORALITY (AGE 16+ - ONLY 10-15% REACH)

At the postconventional level, the individual moves beyond the perspective of their own society . Morality is defined in terms of abstract principles and values that apply to all situations and societies . Only 10-15% of adolescents and adults reach this level .


STAGE 5: SOCIAL CONTRACT AND INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS

AspectDescription
Core Question"What makes a good society?"
FocusIndividual rights; laws as social contracts 
ReasoningLaws and rules are viewed as flexible tools for improving human purposes. There are exceptions to rules when they conflict with individual rights or the greater good. 
ChangeRules can be changed when they no longer serve society's best interests 

Stage 5 Examples

SituationStage 5 Reasoning
Civil disobedience"Sometimes breaking an unjust law is necessary to bring about social change."
Voting"I vote because democratic participation is essential for a just society."
Laws"Laws should protect individual rights and promote the common good. If they don't, they need to be changed."
Equality"Marriage equality laws were changed to allow for more inclusion and respect individual rights." 

Classroom Example 🏫

A student organizes a peaceful protest about a school policy they believe is unfair. Their reasoning involves fundamental rights and the belief that rules should serve students, not just administrative convenience.

The Heinz Dilemma at Stage 5

A person at Stage 5 might say: "Heinz should steal the drug because the right to life is more fundamental than the right to property. While we generally need laws protecting property, in this case, the value of life outweighs that law."


STAGE 6: UNIVERSAL ETHICAL PRINCIPLES

AspectDescription
Core Question"What does conscience demand?"
FocusSelf-chosen ethical principles of conscience 
ReasoningThe appropriate action is determined by one's self-chosen ethical principles—justice, equality, human dignity. These are abstract, universal, and apply to all humanity. 
LawsIf laws conflict with these principles, one must follow conscience 

Stage 6 Examples

SituationStage 6 Reasoning
Historical figuresRosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr., Gandhi—those who followed universal principles despite laws 
Moral courageSpeaking up against injustice even when it's costly personally
Human rightsDefending the rights of all people, not just those in one's own group

The Heinz Dilemma at Stage 6

A person at Stage 6 might say: "Heinz should steal the drug because preserving a human life is a universal ethical duty. The principle of preserving life transcends any particular law. A truly just society would prioritize human life over profit."


📊 SUMMARY TABLE: KOHLBERG'S SIX STAGES

LevelStageNameFocusTypical Age
1: Preconventional1Obedience and PunishmentAvoiding punishment0-9 years 
2Individualism and ExchangePersonal reward, self-interest
2: Conventional3Interpersonal RelationshipsSocial approval, being "good"10-15 years 
4Maintaining Social OrderLaws, rules, duty
3: Postconventional5Social Contract and Individual RightsFlexible laws, greater good16+ years (10-15% reach) 
6Universal Ethical PrinciplesConscience, justice, equality

🔄 PROGRESSION THROUGH THE STAGES

Key Characteristics of Stage Progression

CharacteristicDescription
📈 Invariant SequenceIndividuals progress through stages in the same order; no stage skipping 
⏱️ Variable RateRates of development vary; not everyone reaches higher stages 
📚 Cumulative UnderstandingComprehension of stages is cumulative—understanding a stage means understanding all lower stages 
📏 Increasing DifficultyComprehension of higher stages is increasingly difficult 
🌍 Cross-Cultural SupportAge trends in moral development have received cross-cultural support 

Why People Stop Progressing

ReasonExplanation
Lack of ChallengeNever confronted with moral dilemmas requiring higher reasoning
Limited ExperienceLimited exposure to perspectives beyond own society
Cognitive DevelopmentMay not have reached formal operational thinking needed for postconventional reasoning
Environmental FactorsEnvironment may not support or encourage higher moral reasoning

5.3 CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON KOHLBERG'S THEORY


🧪 STRENGTHS OF KOHLBERG'S THEORY

StrengthExplanation
✅ Research SupportCross-sectional and longitudinal studies confirm upward progression through stages 
✅ Cross-Cultural ValidityAge trends and sequence supported across cultures 
✅ Educational ApplicationsProvides framework for moral education in schools 
✅ Shift in FocusMoved emphasis from behavior to reasoning—how people THINK about moral issues
✅ Developmental FrameworkRecognizes that moral reasoning develops and can be encouraged

⚠️ LIMITATIONS AND CRITICISMS

1. Gender Bias: Carol Gilligan's Critique 👩

AspectGilligan's Argument
Male-Centric ViewKohlberg's theory reflects a male-centric view focusing on justice and rights 
Research SampleTheory based on research using only male subjects 
Women's MoralityWomen appeared deficient when judged by Kohlberg's standards 
Morality of CaringGilligan proposed that females focus on care, relationships, and responsibility rather than abstract justice 
Two MoralitiesMorality of Justice (male) vs. Morality of Caring (female) 

2. Cultural Bias 🌍

CriticismExplanation
Western BiasBased on studies in Western cultures; may not apply equally to other societies 
Collectivist ValuesHighest level (individual principles overriding social tradition) is inconsistent with collectivist cultural values 
Rates vs. SequenceWhile sequence may be universal, rates vary across cultures 
Highest Stage QuestionSome researchers question whether all stages are universal 

3. Overemphasis on Reasoning 🤔

CriticismExplanation
Reasoning vs. BehaviorFocuses on how people THINK about moral problems, not how they ACT 
Ignoring EmotionNeglects the central role of emotion in morality 
Emotion MattersEmotions play a critical role in influencing thoughts and motivating actions 

4. Stage Critique

CriticismExplanation
Stages Not FixedPeople may not always progress in fixed order; may switch stages depending on situation 
Linear Development QuestionedRecent scholarship questions whether path to moral maturity is linear or invariant 
Adults in Earlier StagesMany adults remain at conventional levels 

5. Other Criticisms

CriticismExplanation
Neglects RelationshipsTheory does not adequately consider relationships, affiliation 
Jonathan Haidt's CritiqueMoral development may be more interconnected with social systems; good/bad actions are perceptions, not a priori responses 
Sympathetic ImaginationTheory fails to appreciate importance of sympathetic imagination in deepening moral understanding 

🔬 RECENT SCHOLARSHIP

The 2024 Kohlberg Memorial Lecture identified three fundamental flaws in Kohlberg's account :

FlawDescription
1. Moral Theory PrerequisiteFails to show that studying moral theory is essential for moral maturity
2. Sympathetic ImaginationUnderestimates importance of imagination in deepening moral understanding and engaging the will
3. Linear DevelopmentNo compelling evidence that path to moral maturity is linear, invariant, or involves progressing through increasingly hierarchical stages

5.4 CLASSROOM RELEVANCE AND APPLICATIONS


🏫 WHY KOHLBERG MATTERS FOR TEACHERS

Implications for Moral Education

PrincipleClassroom Application
🧑‍🎓 Students at Different StagesRecognize that students of the same age may be at different moral stages 
📈 Development Can Be EncouragedMoral development can be encouraged through education 
🤔 Focus on ReasoningHelp students examine their moral reasoning, not just make decisions
🔍 Moral DilemmasUse moral dilemmas to stimulate moral growth 
🗣️ DiscussionPeer discussion of dilemmas promotes development

🧩 USING MORAL DILEMMAS IN THE CLASSROOM

The Central Teaching Strategy

The use of moral dilemma stories is the central teaching strategy in Kohlberg-based values education .

Steps for Using Moral Dilemmas

StepDescription
1. Present DilemmaShare a moral dilemma with no obvious right answer (Heinz dilemma or age-appropriate alternatives)
2. Individual AnalysisStudents think about the dilemma alone first 
3. Small Group DiscussionStudents discuss in small groups, explaining their reasoning 
4. Whole Class DiscussionShare different perspectives and reasoning
5. Probe ReasoningAsk "Why?" questions to uncover moral reasoning stage
6. Create Cognitive ConflictPresent reasoning one stage above students' current level to create disequilibrium

Sample Classroom Dilemmas

Age GroupSample Dilemma
ElementaryYour friend cheated on a test. The teacher asks you if you saw anyone cheating. What do you do? Why?
Middle SchoolYou promised to go to a friend's house, but another friend is sad and needs you. What do you do? Why?
High SchoolYou see a student being bullied. If you intervene, the bullies might target you next. What do you do? Why?

📚 TEACHING STRATEGIES BY STAGE

Supporting Students at Different Stages

StageTeacher Strategies
Stage 1Explain rules clearly; be consistent with consequences; help children understand that actions have effects on others 
Stage 2Help students see that cooperation benefits everyone; encourage perspective-taking; discuss fairness
Stage 3Use group activities that build trust; discuss how actions affect relationships; encourage empathy
Stage 4Discuss reasons for rules; help students understand how rules create orderly communities; explore civic responsibility
Stage 5-6Encourage examination of ethical principles; discuss social justice issues; explore civil disobedience and reform

👩‍🏫 TEACHER AS MORAL EDUCATOR

The Teacher's Role

RoleDescription
🧑‍🏫 ModelModel moral reasoning and behavior
🤔 FacilitatorFacilitate discussions that promote moral reasoning
🌱 Creator of ClimateCreate classroom climate that supports moral development
📖 Curriculum IntegratorIntegrate moral discussions across subjects
🔍 ObserverObserve students' moral reasoning to understand their stage

Creating a Just Community

Kohlberg also studied links between moral reasoning and democratic communities . Schools can create "just communities" where:

  • Students participate in rule-making

  • Democratic processes are used to solve problems

  • Students discuss real moral issues in the community

  • Everyone's voice is valued


📝 PSTET EXAM FOCUS: KEY POINTS

Frequently Asked Question Types

Question TypeExampleCorrect Answer
Definition"What is moral reasoning according to Kohlberg?"The thinking process when deciding if a behavior is right or wrong 
Stage Identification"A child follows rules to avoid punishment. Which stage?"Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment
Level Characteristics"What characterizes conventional level?"Focus on social relationships and maintaining order 
Application"Student says 'I'll share if you share with me.' Which stage?"Stage 2: Individualism and Exchange
Critical Perspective"Who criticized Kohlberg for gender bias?"Carol Gilligan 
Dilemma Purpose"Why did Kohlberg use moral dilemmas?"To understand moral reasoning, not decisions 

Common Mistakes to Avoid ❌

MistakeCorrection
Confusing stage namesStage 1: Punishment; Stage 2: Reward/Self-interest; Stage 3: Approval; Stage 4: Law and Order
Thinking all adults reach postconventionalOnly 10-15% reach postconventional level 
Focusing on the decision, not reasoningKohlberg cared about WHY, not WHAT
Ignoring Gilligan's critiqueRemember care vs. justice perspective 
Assuming stages are rigidPeople may use different stages in different situations 

✅ CHAPTER SUMMARY: KEY TAKEAWAYS

TopicKey Points
Kohlberg's FocusMoral reasoning—HOW people think about right and wrong 
Three LevelsPreconventional (external consequences), Conventional (social relationships/order), Postconventional (abstract principles) 
Six Stages1: Punishment, 2: Self-interest, 3: Approval, 4: Law and order, 5: Social contract, 6: Universal principles
Preconventional Age0-9 years; focus on punishment and reward 
Conventional Age10-15 years; focus on relationships and rules 
Postconventional16+ years; only 10-15% reach this level 
Critical PerspectivesGilligan (gender bias), cultural bias, overemphasis on reasoning 
Classroom ApplicationUse moral dilemmas, focus on reasoning, create just community 

📝 PRACTICE QUESTIONS FOR PSTET

Multiple Choice Questions

1. Kohlberg's theory of moral development focuses primarily on:
a) What decision a person makes
b) How a person behaves in moral situations
c) The thinking process when deciding right from wrong
d) The emotional response to moral dilemmas

Answer: c) The thinking process when deciding right from wrong 


2. A child says, "I won't steal because I'll get punished." This child is in which stage?
a) Stage 2: Individualism and Exchange
b) Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment
c) Stage 3: Interpersonal Relationships
d) Stage 4: Maintaining Social Order

Answer: b) Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment 


3. According to Kohlberg, at the conventional level, moral reasoning is based on:
a) Avoiding punishment
b) Personal reward
c) Social relationships and maintaining order
d) Universal ethical principles

Answer: c) Social relationships and maintaining order 


4. Which psychologist criticized Kohlberg's theory for gender bias, arguing for a "morality of caring"?
a) Jean Piaget
b) Carol Gilligan
c) Lev Vygotsky
d) Erik Erikson

Answer: b) Carol Gilligan 


5. The Heinz dilemma was used by Kohlberg to:
a) Test what decision people make
b) Understand the reasoning behind moral choices
c) Measure empathy
d) Assess emotional intelligence

Answer: b) Understand the reasoning behind moral choices 


6. A student says, "I helped my friend because I want him to think I'm a good person." This reflects:
a) Stage 1: Punishment orientation
b) Stage 2: Self-interest
c) Stage 3: Interpersonal relationships
d) Stage 4: Law and order

Answer: c) Stage 3: Interpersonal relationships 


7. What percentage of adolescents and adults reach the postconventional level?
a) 50-60%
b) 70-80%
c) 10-15%
d) 90-95%

Answer: c) 10-15% 


8. According to Kohlberg's theory, which statement is TRUE about stage progression?
a) Stages can be skipped
b) Everyone reaches the highest stage
c) Stages occur in an invariant sequence
d) Progression is automatic with age

Answer: c) Stages occur in an invariant sequence 


9. A person at Stage 5 (Social Contract) would believe that:
a) Rules should never be broken
b) Laws are fixed and absolute
c) Rules can be changed when they don't serve the greater good
d) Only personal consequences matter

Answer: c) Rules can be changed when they don't serve the greater good 


10. Which of the following is a limitation of Kohlberg's theory?
a) It applies only to Western cultures
b) It overemphasizes emotion in moral reasoning
c) It focuses too much on how people behave
d) It neglects the role of emotion in morality

Answer: d) It neglects the role of emotion in morality 


Short Answer Questions

11. Distinguish between the three levels of Kohlberg's theory with examples.

Answer:

  • Preconventional Level (0-9 years) : Morality based on external consequences. Example: Child follows rules to avoid punishment (Stage 1) or gain rewards (Stage 2). 

  • Conventional Level (10-15 years) : Morality based on social relationships and maintaining order. Example: Person follows rules to be seen as "good" (Stage 3) or to maintain social order (Stage 4). 

  • Postconventional Level (16+ years) : Morality based on abstract principles. Example: Person follows conscience even when it conflicts with laws (Stage 6). 


12. Explain Carol Gilligan's critique of Kohlberg's theory.

Answer: Carol Gilligan criticized Kohlberg's theory for gender bias because:

  • Kohlberg's research was based on only male subjects 

  • Women appeared deficient when judged by Kohlberg's male-centric standards 

  • Kohlberg's theory focuses on justice and rights (male orientation) while ignoring care and relationships (female orientation) 

  • Gilligan proposed a "Morality of Caring" as an alternative framework where women focus on maintaining relationships and responding to others' needs 


13. How can teachers use Kohlberg's theory in the classroom?

Answer: Teachers can:

  • Use moral dilemmas to stimulate moral reasoning (central teaching strategy) 

  • Recognize that students of same age may be at different stages 

  • Ask "Why?" questions to understand students' reasoning

  • Present reasoning one stage above students' current level to create cognitive conflict

  • Create a "just community" with democratic participation 

  • Facilitate discussions where students hear different perspectives

  • Integrate moral discussions across subjects


14. Describe the Heinz dilemma and explain how responses differ at Stage 2 and Stage 4.

Answer: The Heinz dilemma involves a man who must decide whether to steal an expensive drug to save his dying wife. 

At Stage 2 (Self-interest) , a person might say: "Heinz should steal the drug because he needs his wife. If she dies, he'll have to find someone else, and that would be hard." OR "He shouldn't steal because he might get caught and go to jail."

At Stage 4 (Law and Order) , a person might say: "Heinz should not steal because stealing is against the law. If everyone stole whenever they needed something, society would break down." OR "Heinz should steal it, but then turn himself in to face the legal consequences."

The difference is Stage 2 focuses on personal consequences, while Stage 4 focuses on maintaining social order and respecting laws. 


🎯 FINAL EXAM TIPS

  1. 🔍 Focus on reasoning, not decisions - Kohlberg cared about WHY people make choices

  2. 📖 Memorize the three levels and six stages with names and ages

  3. 👧 Know Gilligan's critique - gender bias, care vs. justice

  4. 🌍 Understand cultural considerations - sequence universal, rates vary; highest stage may reflect Western bias 

  5. 📊 Remember percentages - only 10-15% reach postconventional 

  6. 🏫 Apply to classroom - moral dilemmas, discussion, creating just community

  7. 🔬 Cite methodology - Moral Judgment Interview, Heinz dilemma 


📖 MNEMONICS TO REMEMBER

For the Three Levels: People Can Ponder - Preconventional, Conventional, Postconventional

For the Six Stages: Please Insist Good Laws Serve Us - Punishment, Individualism, Good Boy/Nice Girl, Law and Order, Social Contract, Universal Principles

For Stage 1 (Punishment): Punishment 1st - avoiding consequences

For Stage 2 (Self-interest): 2 for me - what's in it for me?

For Stage 3 (Approval): 3's company - caring about relationships

For Stage 4 (Law and Order): 4 all society - maintaining order for everyone

For Stage 5 (Social Contract): 5lexible rules - laws can change

For Stage 6 (Universal Principles): 6th sense - following inner conscience


📝 NOTES SECTION

text
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________

🔜 COMING UP IN CHAPTER 6

In the next chapter, we will explore Understanding Intelligence: Multiple Intelligences and Critical Perspectives - moving beyond traditional IQ to understand the many ways children are intelligent.


Happy Learning! Best Wishes for Your PSTET Preparation! 📚✨

This response is AI-generated, for reference only.